Home Start Back Next End
  
Atlas, and of their commerce with the inhabitants of Venus.
                              VII.
              OF MARRIAGE AND OTHER CURIOUS CUSTOMS
                      OF  THE  ATLANTEANS:
                 AND OF SACRIFICES TO THE GODS.
   I  have  already adverted to that most singular conception  of 
the  duty  of the married which opposes the customs of  Atlas  to 
those  of any other race on Earth.  But the considerations  which 
established  it have yet to be discussed.  I will not  insist  on 
that  gross  and  cynical point of view which might  perceive  in 
English  marriage today a practical vindication of the  Atlantean 
position.  On the contrary, in Atlas marriage formed the loftiest 
of  ideals.  It  resembles  the 'Hermetic  marriage'  of  certain 
alchemists.  The  bond between the parties was only stronger  for 
the  absence of the lower link.  The idea underlying this was  in 
the  main  a  particular  case of the  general  proposition  that 
whatever  was natural should be transcended.  As will be seen  in 
the final chapter, the very stigma of success in their Great Work 
was the transcending of the sexual process.  The bond of marriage 
was not, however, entirely of this negative character. It had its 
positive side, and here closely resembled the so-called Christian 
doctrine  of Christ and the church.  Husband and wife were to  be 
father and daughter,  mother and son, brother and sister, teacher 
and  pupil,  and above all,  friends.  And this relation  was  to 
subsist on all planes.  The hieroglyph of love was a cross;  that 
of marriage,  parallel straight lines, and as the cross was to be 
transcended in the circle, so were these lines to converge not on 
earth,  but  in Venus.  In the meanwhile each partner led his own 
free life;  and it often occurred that a woman,  having borne two 
children  to a man and married him,  would bear two  children  to 
another man,  and so on perhaps for two centuries, thus acquiring 
a cohort of husbands.  Such an arrangement must clearly have lead 
to  grave confusion had any question of property and  inheritance 
been involved, but notions so unfortunate were unknown. Where all 
had  every heart's desire,  of what value were they?  It is  true 
that  some division of labour (though little) was involved in the 
social  scheme,   but  it  occurred  to  no  one  to  regard  the 
supervision  of serviles as less honourable than the offering  of 
great sacrifices.  In a perfect organism one part is as necessary 
and  decent as any other part,  and no sane observer  can  reason 
otherwise.  For a perfect organism has a single definite aim, and 
the  only dishonourable feather on an arrow would be one that was 
out of place. Human nature being what it is, one may nevertheless 
agree  that  this measureless content with  the  existing  order, 
except  in  so  far as the purpose of the establishment  of  that 
order  was  unfulfilled,  was rendered possible  by  the  extreme 
lightness  of  the  toil demanded of any individual.  But  it  is 
impossible  for  slaves to understand free men.  It is  always  a 
wonder  to  Englishmen  that  a  man  should  devote  himself  to 
unremitting  toil  for an ideal. He is  called  a  crank,  basely 
slandered,  the  lowest motives being without any reason assigned 
to his actions,  mocked,  persecuted,  perhaps crucified. This is 
partly   forgivable,   as  in  England  philanthropy  is   almost 
invariably the mask of vice and fraud.
   The ceremony of marriage* was simple, dignified, yet poignant. 
The  lovers  in  the presence  of  their  whole  house,  publicly