Home Start Back Next End
  
plus 1,  and 5 plus 2,  and 4 plus 3,  and so on; as well as 'the 
root  of 49',  'half 14' and the like.  They even distinguished 4 
plus  3 from 3 plus 4.  Each number also represented an  idea  or 
group  of ideas on all sorts of planes.  It would have been quite 
possible to discuss dressmaking in terms of pure number.  To give 
an example of the way in which their minds thought,  consider the 
number  three.  Three,  in  so far as it gives  the  first  plane 
figure,  suggests  superficies;  with regard to the dimensions of 
space,  solidity.  Three itself is therefore 'that ineffably holy 
thing in which the superficies is the solid'.  Of course hundreds 
of other ideas must be added to this;  and to grasp and harmonize 
them  all  in one colossal supra-rational idea was  the  constant 
task  of  every mathematician.  The upshot of this was  that  all 
numbers above 33 were regarded as spurious, illusionary; they had 
no real existence of their own*;  they were temporary  compounds, 
unreal in very much the same sense as our square root of 1.  They 
were  always expressed by graphic formulae,  like our own organic 
compounds.  To take an example,  the number 156 was regarded as a 
sort of efflorescence of the number 7;  it was never written  but 
as 77 plus [(7+7)/7] plus 77. Again 11 was usually written 3 plus 
5  plus  3.  It  was  always the aim to find  symmetry  in  these 
expressions,  and also 'to find an easy way to 1'.  This last  is 
difficult to explain.
   Eleven was their great 'Key of Magic'.  It is a twofold number 
in  'the act of becoming 1'.  Thirty-seven was the essence  of  1 
inasmuch  as  multiplying it by 3 gives 111,  three  ones,  which 
divided again by 3 in another manner,  yield 1. "One would rather 
think of 48 as 37 plus 11 than as 4 times 12" is the statement of 
an  elementary text-book dating from the earliest days of  Atlas. 
It  was a sort of moral duty to teach the mind to think  in  this 
manner.
   The  number 7 was the 'perfect number' with them as  with  us, 
but for very different reasons. It was the link between Earth and 
Venus, for one thing; I cannot explain why. It was 'the number of 
Atla',  and  the  'house  of success' (two being  the  'house  of 
battle').  It was also grace, softness, ease, healing and 'joy of 
Zro'  as  well  as 'play  of  phosphorus'.  Many  mathematicians, 
however, attacked it with rigour; there was at one time an almost 
general consent to replace it by 8, and its 'rapture-combination' 
31,  by  33.  Despite the intense preoccupation with such  ideas, 
mathematics  as we know them had reached a perfection which if it 
does not surpass that of our own civilization,  fails principally 
because  of its theorems,  handed down to Euclid and  Pythagoras, 
although imperfectly, formed a springboard whence we might leap.
   The  initiation of children was also a matter reserved for the 
High House.  Weaned at three months,  the children were tended by 
the lower classes until the age of puberty,  an occurrence  which 
fitted them at once for initiation.  A legate from the High House 
was  sent  for,  and  in  his presence  the  child  was  brought, 
acquainted  with  Zro  by  its  father  and  mother,   and   full 
instruction  in 'working' was further conferred by any member  of 
the  'house'  who  chose to do so,  this in practice  meaning  by 
everybody.  The  ceremonies were frequently long and  exhausting; 
children  often enough died in the course of them.  This was  not 
regarded  as a serious calamity;  some schools of magicians  even 
pretended to rejoice. The representatives of the High House had a 
prior  right to the parents of the child;  at times he  conducted 
the initiation in person, a high honour, but invariably fatal. On